🔗 Share this article

Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the 88 years of age, sold eleven million books of her various grand books over her five-decade literary career. Beloved by all discerning readers over a specific age (45), she was brought to a modern audience last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.

The Beloved Series

Devoted fans would have preferred to watch the Rutshire chronicles in sequence: commencing with Riders, originally published in the mid-80s, in which the character Rupert Campbell-Black, rogue, philanderer, equestrian, is first introduced. But that’s a sidebar – what was notable about viewing Rivals as a box set was how effectively Cooper’s fictional realm had remained relevant. The chronicles distilled the 80s: the power dressing and puffball skirts; the preoccupation with social class; nobility sneering at the flashy new money, both dismissing everyone else while they quibbled about how room-temperature their bubbly was; the sexual politics, with harassment and abuse so commonplace they were practically figures in their own right, a duo you could trust to advance the story.

While Cooper might have inhabited this age completely, she was never the typical fish not noticing the ocean because it’s everywhere. She had a compassion and an keen insight that you maybe wouldn’t guess from hearing her talk. Everyone, from the canine to the horse to her mother and father to her international student's relative, was always “completely delightful” – unless, that is, they were “truly heavenly”. People got assaulted and further in Cooper’s work, but that was never acceptable – it’s astonishing how acceptable it is in many more highbrow books of the period.

Background and Behavior

She was affluent middle-class, which for all intents and purposes meant that her parent had to hold down a job, but she’d have described the classes more by their mores. The middle-class people anxiously contemplated about all things, all the time – what society might think, primarily – and the aristocracy didn’t give a … well “nonsense”. She was risqué, at times very much, but her prose was never coarse.

She’d describe her family life in fairytale terms: “Father went to the war and Mummy was deeply concerned”. They were both completely gorgeous, participating in a enduring romance, and this Cooper emulated in her own union, to a editor of military histories, Leo Cooper. She was twenty-four, he was twenty-seven, the relationship wasn’t smooth sailing (he was a philanderer), but she was consistently comfortable giving people the secret for a successful union, which is creaking bed springs but (crucial point), they’re noisy with all the joy. He never read her books – he picked up Prudence once, when he had influenza, and said it made him feel worse. She wasn't bothered, and said it was mutual: she wouldn’t be seen dead reading battle accounts.

Constantly keep a journal – it’s very difficult, when you’re mid-twenties, to recollect what twenty-four felt like

Early Works

Prudence (the late 70s) was the fifth book in the Romance series, which began with Emily in the mid-70s. If you discovered Cooper in reverse, having started in Rutshire, the Romances, also known as “the novels named after upper-class women” – also Imogen and Harriet – were almost there, every male lead feeling like a prototype for Campbell-Black, every main character a little bit weak. Plus, line for line (Without exact data), there was less sex in them. They were a bit reserved on topics of decorum, women always being anxious that men would think they’re immoral, men saying outrageous statements about why they preferred virgins (similarly, apparently, as a true gentleman always wants to be the primary to open a container of coffee). I don’t know if I’d recommend reading these novels at a impressionable age. I believed for a while that that was what the upper class actually believed.

They were, however, incredibly precisely constructed, successful romances, which is much harder than it sounds. You experienced Harriet’s unwanted pregnancy, Bella’s difficult in-laws, Emily’s remote Scottish life – Cooper could guide you from an desperate moment to a lottery win of the heart, and you could not ever, even in the initial stages, pinpoint how she achieved it. One minute you’d be smiling at her meticulously detailed depictions of the bed linen, the next you’d have tears in your eyes and no idea how they got there.

Writing Wisdom

Questioned how to be a author, Cooper used to say the sort of advice that the literary giant would have said, if he could have been bothered to help out a beginner: employ all 5 of your perceptions, say how things smelled and looked and sounded and touched and tasted – it really lifts the writing. But perhaps more practical was: “Always keep a journal – it’s very hard, when you’re mid-twenties, to remember what age 24 felt like.” That’s one of the initial observations you notice, in the longer, more populated books, which have seventeen main characters rather than just one, all with decidedly aristocratic names, unless they’re American, in which case they’re called Helen. Even an years apart of four years, between two siblings, between a gentleman and a female, you can perceive in the conversation.

A Literary Mystery

The historical account of Riders was so exactly Jilly Cooper it couldn't possibly have been accurate, except it definitely is true because London’s Evening Standard published a notice about it at the period: she completed the complete book in the early 70s, prior to the Romances, brought it into the city center and misplaced it on a bus. Some texture has been deliberately left out of this story – what, for instance, was so significant in the city that you would abandon the unique draft of your manuscript on a train, which is not that unlike forgetting your infant on a railway? Undoubtedly an meeting, but what kind?

Cooper was inclined to amp up her own disorder and haplessness